I have been called argumentative at times although I like to think of it as being controversial. I will also say I like a good discussion as much as the next deliberator, however, there is a debate raging in the cloud space that I just don’t get.
The basic question in the battle field is what vendor service(s)is classified as either Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service(PaaS) or Software as a Service (SaaS). In our world we look at it like this; The Pervasive DataCloud2, an example of PaaS, it sits on Amazon Web Services, what I consider to be IaaS, and provides services to IaaS, PaaS, as well as SaaS.
I could be wrong, but come on folks, does it really matter what label is on the vendor? If they have a service that fits your need, will you not buy it because they (or more likely some analyst) labeled it incorrectly? Check out the latest thread on the Google Cloud Computing Group .
This argument is gaining in size and seemingly in importance to rival what “size of government”, “amount of taxes” and “the national debt” already own in the political circles of this country.
I am pretty sure if my electric company changed their classification from an utility to a Electricity as a Service (EaaS) I would not stop using the current that comes out the end of their wires. I am also sure that someone will take offense to my simplification of this description, but if you do, please help me by explaining the importance while you’re complaining.